Phrasal Verbs in Media Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65469/eijournal.2026.2.20Keywords:
phrasal verbs, media discourse, idiomaticity, figurative language, discourse analysis, journalistic language, lexical unitsAbstract
This article examines the role and functions of phrasal verbs in media discourse, highlighting their structural, semantic, and pragmatic characteristics. Phrasal verbs, as multi-word lexical units, represent a significant component of the English language due to their idiomaticity, flexibility, and high frequency of use. The study explores their classification into phrasal, prepositional, and phrasal-prepositional verbs, as well as their syntactic features such as separability and particle movement. Particular attention is given to the distinction between literal and figurative meanings, emphasizing the challenges they pose for interpretation, especially in media contexts. The research further analyzes how phrasal verbs contribute to the accessibility, expressiveness, and persuasive power of media language. In journalistic discourse, they serve not only as tools for concise communication but also as mechanisms of framing and evaluation, influencing readers’ perception of events. The study also considers the role of metaphor and cognitive processes in shaping the meaning of figurative phrasal verbs. Additionally, it addresses the increasing informality of media language and its implications for communication and translation. The findings demonstrate that phrasal verbs are essential linguistic devices that enhance the dynamism and effectiveness of media discourse while reflecting broader sociolinguistic trends.
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F. R. (1988). The English Verb. London: Longman.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Ысмайылова, Б., & Иманкулова, Т. (2025). Роль синонимии в изучении английского языка как второго. Вестник Ошского государственного университета. Филология, 2(6), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.52754/16948874_2025_2(6)_3







